Compare · manual entry

Typing statements works. It is also the most expensive way to do it.

Most firms still get statements into the books the same way: a person reads each line and types it. It is reliable, it needs no setup, and it quietly eats the hours that matter most.

Review · ACME
Checks read, payee and memofrom the check images
Categorized by your rulesthis client's chart of accounts
Sample firm, invented data
The real job

Typing a statement is never just typing.

The person doing it reads each transaction, decides what it is, finds the right account, keys the date, the payee, the memo and the amount, and then does it again for the next line. When the statement is a scan, or the client's checks are handwritten, the reading is half the work. When it is done, someone still has to check that the month ties out against the bank.

None of that is judgment work. The judgment shows up later, in review, classification questions and advising the client. The typing is the part in between, and it is the part that swallows evenings during busy season.

Typed by hand6 of 6 by a person, every line
Read the lineBy hand
Decide what it isBy hand
Find the accountBy hand
Key date, payee, memo, amountBy hand
Next line, againBy hand
Tie out the monthBy hand
With QBuddy6 of 6 done · your team reviews
Read the lineDone
Decide what it isDone
Find the accountDone
Key date, payee, memo, amountDone
Next line, againDone
Tie out the monthDone
Side by side

Manual entry and QBuddy, line by line.

Manual entryQBuddy
Who does the workA staff member, line by lineQBuddy reads, categorizes and posts; your team reviews
Handwritten checksDeciphered and keyed by handRead from the check images, payee and memo included
CategorizationDepends on who is typing that dayYour rules on each client's chart of accounts, the same way every time
VerificationA manual tie-out at the end, if there is timeBalanceProof checks count, credits, debits and ending balance first
DestinationKeyed into QuickBooks directlyQuickBooks Online or any Desktop version, one click
Busy seasonThe bottleneck grows with the pileThe same statement takes the same minutes in April as in July
Honestly

Where manual entry still wins.

Very small volumes. If your whole practice types twenty transactions a month, the overhead of changing anything may not pay for itself. Manual entry also needs no setup at all, and for a one-off oddball document a person is still the most flexible reader there is.

The math changes as volume grows. Put your own numbers into the cost calculator, hours per week and your average rate, and see what the typing costs your firm per year. No industry statistics, just your inputs.

QBuddy ROI view: hours saved, labor value saved and a cumulative hours saved chart
Once QBuddy does the typing, its ROI view keeps the score: the hand keying nobody had to do, added up month by month, with your own minutes per transaction and hourly rate. Sample firm, invented data.
The core difference: manual entry scales by hiring or by working later. QBuddy scales by feeding it another statement. Your people keep the review and the judgment, which is the part clients actually pay for.

See it on your own statements.

Book a 15-minute demo and bring the messiest statement you have. We will run it live.